Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Teaching/employment opportunities at prestigious Bangladeshi university

Friends,

The email below is self explanatory, but I just wanted to add that it will not only be a great experience professionally, but can hopefully also contribute to some person fulfillment as well.

All the best,

Zeeshan



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sajid Huq <huq.sajid@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 28, 2007 11:15 AM
Subject: teaching/working for BRAC

I am forwarding an excerpt of an email from the Dean of the Economics and Social Sciences Department (ESS) at BRAC University. BRAC University is a private university in Dhaka, Bangladesh . It is among the best private institutions in Dhaka . And being a part of the very impressive umbrella of its mother organization, BRAC (http://www.brac.net/ ), means that if anyone is interested in teaching there, the person would have access to the tremendous resources and programs of one of the world's premier NGOs and micro-credit institutions. Such is BRAC's reach that people in Bangladesh call the organization a state within the state. It is also expanding its coverage to Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The excerpt from the Dean, Dr. Anwar:

"Let me ask your assistance in recruiting faculty members. Perhaps you know that we have obtained the UGC's approval to start a Masters of Science ( M.S.) in Applied Economics through ESS. We are getting ourselves ready to start the program this summer (May, 2007). We are searching for faculty members who can teach economics courses both at undergraduate and graduate levels.

We are looking for faculty who would be interested in teaching in Bangladesh. It can be long or short term. Long-term candidates would ideally have a Ph.D. The short term candidates are those who would teach for a semester or a year, minimum qualification would be a masters degree or an ABD. A Ph.D. candidate with intention to conduct dissertation research in Bangladesh will be welcome."

I should add that the compensation at BRAC is quite competitive, and higher than most South Asian Universities. I say this with a reasonable knowledge of compensation at most Indian Universities. If interested, please contact me off the list!
It should be a great experience, even if it is for this summer only.

Warm Regards.

--
Sajid Huq
PhD Candidate & Teaching Fellow
Columbia University

huq.sajid@gmail.com | http://addafication.com/

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

The Bosnians propose, the ICJ disposes...

I havent read up enough on the recent International Court of Justice ruling that absolves the Serbians of state-sponsored genocide of the Bosnians (but says they did not prevent it either), but my initial thoughts are of disappointment and sadness.

If the ruling stated that the Serbians were responsible for the carnage and atrocities, the Bosnians were eligible for billions of dollars of assistance. While this horrific chapter finally approaches its conclusion, I would have been happy, but am not. I dont think living with the mere thought that the Serbians have been found guilty of being complicit in the crimes is enough.

Because of this complicity, and the lack of reparations they could have gotten, the Bosnians have lost faith in the world's justice system. The only court that could have given them justice, shied away from it when it had the opportunity to. The billions of dollars could have single-handedly raised living standards.

Instead, today, we see the Bosnians even more distraught, hopeless and saddened as they sit on the world's stage, the international community watching them as it smirks and giggles at them. What were they thinking? say onlookers and bystanders. Justice? What a joke...

I wonder who will have the last laugh in this story...

Monday, February 26, 2007

Article: Jolie adds glamour to US think-tank

So Angelie Jolie joins the Council on Foreign Relations.

This news isn't surprising, but I dont know what it would mean politically. What would her responsibilities be as a CFR member? What impact would she have? And most frightening - will she even be taken seriously?

I am assuming - and hoping - this is good news. I'm also definitely very interested in seeing what evolves out of this new role for her.

Complete article here.

Friday, February 23, 2007

Occupied Gaza like apartheid South Africa, says UN report

I remember blogging about UN Special Rapporteur for human rights in the Palestinian territories, John Dugard, earlier when one of his articles appeared in a prominent Atlanta newspaper. But alas, that was Atlanta, and this current article is from The Guardian. One can imagine the difference in readership, as well as the impact its contents can have.

He says similar things, ie Israel is an apartheid state and it is racist, but one would hope that we move beyond these discussions, and instead, work toward a sustainable solution.

I must say, though, that such a solution cannot take place without the developed world's support, and if the US and Britain continue to play irresponsible, or rather, unresponsive, roles, then we are truly doomed.

Without further ado, here's the article.

The myth of Muslim support for terror

This article made my day! I love the Christian Science Monitor as a media outlet to begin with, but wish their mass appeal somehow made its way down South or further West where mainstream America should be reading it as a matter of habit.

The results of the polls do not surprise me; it is the publishing/coverage of them in a major media outlet that does. But then again, the CS Monitor is always a step ahead of the rest of its peers.

I've copied the article in its entirety below. Happy reading and enjoy the weekend!

The myth of Muslim support for terror

The common enemy is violence and terrorism, not Muslims any more than Christians or Jews.

By Kenneth Ballen

Those who think that Muslim countries and pro-terrorist attitudes go hand-in-hand might be shocked by new polling research: Americans are more approving of terrorist attacks against civilians than any major Muslim country except for Nigeria.

The survey, conducted in December 2006 by the University of Maryland's prestigious Program on International Public Attitudes, shows that only 46 percent of Americans think that "bombing and other attacks intentionally aimed at civilians" are "never justified," while 24 percent believe these attacks are "often or sometimes justified."

Contrast those numbers with 2006 polling results from the world's most-populous Muslim countries – Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nigeria. Terror Free Tomorrow, the organization I lead, found that 74 percent of respondents in Indonesia agreed that terrorist attacks are "never justified"; in Pakistan, that figure was 86 percent; in Bangladesh, 81 percent.

Do these findings mean that Americans are closet terrorist sympathizers?

Hardly. Yet, far too often, Americans and other Westerners seem willing to draw that conclusion about Muslims. Public opinion surveys in the United States and Europe show that nearly half of Westerners associate Islam with violence and Muslims with terrorists. Given the many radicals who commit violence in the name of Islam around the world, that's an understandable polling result.

But these stereotypes, affirmed by simplistic media coverage and many radicals themselves, are not supported by the facts – and they are detrimental to the war on terror. When the West wrongly attributes radical views to all of the world's 1.5 billion Muslims, it perpetuates a myth that has the very real effect of marginalizing critical allies in the war on terror.

Indeed, the far-too-frequent stereotyping of Muslims serves only to reinforce the radical appeal of the small minority of Muslims who peddle hatred of the West and others as authentic religious practice.

Terror Free Tomorrow's 20-plus surveys of Muslim countries in the past two years reveal another surprise: Even among the minority who indicated support for terrorist attacks and Osama bin Laden, most overwhelmingly approved of specific American actions in their own countries. For example, 71 percent of bin Laden supporters in Indonesia and 79 percent in Pakistan said they thought more favorably of the United States as a result of American humanitarian assistance in their countries – not exactly the profile of hard-core terrorist sympathizers. For most people, their professed support of terrorism/bin Laden can be more accurately characterized as a kind of "protest vote" against current US foreign policies, not as a deeply held religious conviction or even an inherently anti- American or anti-Western view.

In truth, the common enemy is violence and terrorism, not Muslims any more than Christians or Jews. Whether recruits to violent causes join gangs in Los Angeles or terrorist cells in Lahore, the enemy is the violence they exalt.

Our surveys show that not only do Muslims reject terrorism as much if not more than Americans, but even those who are sympathetic to radical ideology can be won over by positive American actions that promote goodwill and offer real hope.

America's goal, in partnership with Muslim public opinion, should be to defeat terrorists by isolating them from their own societies. The most effective policies to achieve that goal are the ones that build on our common humanity. And we can start by recognizing that Muslims throughout the world want peace as much as Americans do.

Kenneth Ballen is founder and president of Terror Free Tomorrow, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to finding effective policies that win popular support away from global terrorists.

Mr. Ballen's contact info is below - send him a thank you note!

Ken Ballen, President

Terror Free Tomorrow

(202) 274-1800 x 201

Kballen@terrorfreetomorrow.org

www.terrorfreetomorrow.org

PO Box 5704

Washington, DC 20016